RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) can lead to a substantial disease burden for those affected, in particular by the concomitant occurrence of other IMIDs or in the presence of comorbidities. The care of patients with IMIDs is complex and involves various medical disciplines. OBJECTIVE: To describe the burden of disease and the current routine drug treatment of patients with IMID. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective cross-sectional analysis was based on statutory health insurance claims data from the InGef database. Prevalent patients with psoriasis (Pso), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), spondylarthritis (SpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (MC), ulcerative colitis (CU), or connective tissue disease were identified among 3,988,695 insured patients in 2018. The concomitant occurrence of different IMIDs and the extent to which patients with IMID are affected by other comorbidities compared to a reference population were investigated. The current routine drug treatment was described based on the use of predefined forms of treatment. RESULTS: In the database 188,440 patients with IMID (4.7%) were identified. Compared to the reference population the prevalence of comorbidities, such as depressive episodes and cardiovascular risk factors was higher in patients with IMID. For MC, CU, RA, and PsA disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and classical systemic forms of treatment were used most commonly. In Pso, SpA, and connective tissue disease nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were the most frequently used treatment often in combination with other drugs. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients with IMIDs (16.9-27.5%) suffer from different diseases of the IMID group. They are frequently affected by accompanying illnesses and require interdisciplinary medical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Artritis Reumatoide , Psoriasis , Espondiloartritis , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espondiloartritis/terapia , Agentes InmunomoduladoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory diseases (immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, IMID) can overlap or occur simultaneously due to clinical similarities. The resulting utilization of heathcare structures has not yet been investigated across disciplines but is of potential importance for optimizing the treatment of patients with IMID. AIM OF THE WORK: Analysis of epidemiological data including utilization of care services in patients with selected IMIDs: psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and connective tissue disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis based on health insurances accounting data with a sample of approximately 4 million insured persons, the prevalence of the abovementioned IMID and the frequency of IMID combinations were analyzed based on documented diagnoses (ICD-10 GM). The frequency of hospitalizations and utilization of outpatient physician contacts was recorded in predefined specialist disciplines (general medicine, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology) and compared with an age-adjusted and gender-adjusted reference population. RESULTS: A total of 188,440 patients had at least 1 of the IMID diagnoses analyzed (4.7%), with an age peak of 61-70 years. The highest prevalence was observed for psoriasis (1.85%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (1.38%). Combinations with at least one other IMID were relatively common (29%), with this being most common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (82.9%, of which 68.2% had psoriasis), followed by ankylosing spondylitis (27.5%) and Crohn's disease (21.6%). Compared to the reference population, patients with IMID were hospitalized more often and more frequently utilized the outpatient disciplines. DISCUSSION: The study results describe that IMIDs occur in combination and that the patients make comparatively more use of care structures of different disciplines. A multidisciplinary approach could increase the efficiency of care; an evaluation is still pending.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease. Many patients are initiating a systemic therapy, if the disease is not adequately controlled with topical treatment only. Currently, there is little real-world evidence on the AD-related medical care situation in Germany. This study analyzed patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with systemically treated AD for the German healthcare system. METHODS: In this descriptive, retrospective cohort study, aggregated anonymized German health claims data from the InGef research database were used. Within a representative sample of four million insured individuals, patients with AD and systemic drug therapy initiation (SDTI) in the index year 2017 were identified and included into the study cohort. Systemic drug therapy included dupilumab, systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and systemic immunosuppressants (SIS). Patients were observed for one year starting from the date of SDTI in 2017. RESULTS: 9975 patients were included (57.8% female, mean age 39.6 years [SD 25.5]). In the one-year observation period, the most common systemic drug therapy was SCS (> 99.0%). Administrations of dupilumab (0.3%) or dispensations of SIS were rare (cyclosporine: 0.5%, azathioprine: 0.6%, methotrexate: 0.1%). Median treatment duration of SCS, cyclosporine and azathioprine was 27 days, 102 days, and 109 days, respectively. 2.8% of the patients received phototherapy; 41.6% used topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor. Average annual costs for medications amounted to 1237 per patient. Outpatient services were used by 99.6% with associated mean annual costs of 943; 25.4% had at least one hospitalization (mean annual costs: 5836). 5.3% of adult patients received sickness benefits with associated mean annual costs of 5026. CONCLUSIONS: Despite unfavorable risk-benefit profile, this study demonstrated a common treatment with SCS, whereas other systemic drug therapy options were rarely used. Furthermore, the results suggest a substantial economic burden for patients with AD and SDTI.
RESUMEN
In Germany, there is little real-world evidence on physicians' choice of oral anticoagulants (OACs). Our study aimed at assessing preferences for and prescribing patterns of treatment options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in clinical practice in Germany. We conducted a nationwide quantitative online survey among office-based physicians in Germany. Physicians were asked about their preference for and use of treatment options as well as factors influencing their choice of a specific OAC. A total of n = 953 physicians was surveyed in September and October 2020 (general physicians: 36.0%; internists: 37.3%; cardiologists: 23.7%; neurologists: 10.5%; multiple specialties possible). Preference and use were highest for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs); followed by vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Most preferred OACs were apixaban (39.3%), rivaroxaban (28.5%) and edoxaban (14.7%). Most used OACs were apixaban (24.3%), rivaroxaban (21.2%) and phenprocoumon (21.4%). NOACs were preferred more often than used (85.6% > 68.6%). VKAs were preferred less often than used (9.6% < 23.5%). OAC attributes and patient characteristics related to efficacy and safety, as well as patients' kidney function were most important when selecting a specific OAC. Federal and regional governance instruments likely influenced treatment decision-making. We found a high divergence between preferences for and use of available treatment options in clinical practice. Further exploration of the importance of OAC attributes, patient characteristics as well as federal and regional governance instruments for physicians' choice of a specific OAC may help to further optimize the healthcare of patients with atrial fibrillation in the long-term.
